USPTO serial 78427356
SPORTMEN'S WAVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPORTMEN'S WAVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen Beacom Gorman
Maureen Beacom Gorman MB Gorman Law, P.C.7777 Lake Street, Suite 117River Forest, IL 60305UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair and skin care products, namely skin soaps, concealers for skin, face, and body, cosmetic creams for skin care, cosmetic preparations for skin renewal, cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care, decorative transfers, and exfoliants for skin, lotions for skin, hair, face, body, and hair waving, non-medicated skin care preparations, non-medicated skin creams, skin abrasive preparations, skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum, skin clarifiers, skin cleansers, skin conditioners, skin emollients, skin lighteners, skin lightening creams, skin masks, skin moisturizer, skin moisturizer masks, skin texturizers, skin toners, skin whitening creams, skin whitening preparations, topical skins sprays for cosmetic purposes, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, beauty creams for body care, body and beauty care cosmetics, body and beauty care preparations, body cream, body emulsions, body mask cream, body mask lotion, body mask powder, body masks, body milk, body oil, body powder, body scrub, body spray used as a personal deodorant and as fragrance, body sprays, cosmetic preparations for body care, deodorants for body care, face and body creams, face milk, make-up products for the face and body, non-medicated body soaks, scented body spray, toning lotion, for the face, body and hands, hair conditioner, conditioners, exfoliants for hair, gel for hair, hair balsam, hair bleach, hair bleaching preparations, hair care preparations, hair cleaning preparations, hair color, hair color removers, hair creams, hair decolorants, hair dressings for men, hair dyes, hair emollients, hair lighteners, hairmousse, hair nourishers, hair oils, hair pomades, hair relaxing preparations, hair removing cream, hair rinses, hair rinses shampoo-conditioners, hair shampoo, hair spray, hair straightening preparations, hair styling gel, hair styling preparations, hair styling spray, hair tonic, hair-washing powder, hydrogen peroxide for use on the hair, mousse for hair and skin facial, oil baths for hair care, oils for hair conditioning, pomades for hair and lip,shampoos | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |