Drawing for MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING

USPTO serial 78427921

MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3084505Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman SNR DENTON US LLPP.O. Box #061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer firmware used within power supplies to regulate the amount of power output based upon available power input, sold to manufactures of devices containing power suppliesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 13, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 14, 2011CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jan 13, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2008WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2008WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Apr 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance