CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ALWAYS CRISP SENSATIONS

USPTO serial 78428364

ALWAYS CRISP SENSATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALWAYS CRISP SENSATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

P. Scott Maclean

P SCOTT MACLEAN CASSAN MACLEAN307 GILMOUR STOTTAWA, ON K2P 0P7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen French fries and other frozen potato products, namely, potato patties, potato nuggets, potato crowns, potato logs and hash brownsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 11, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 28, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 25, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 12, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 8, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 17, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 17, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 29, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 29, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 22, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 21, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 14, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 1, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 26, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance