USPTO serial 78428550
SKIP A MEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3343751Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SKIP A MEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Charitable services, namely, the organization, promotion and operation of non-denominational volunteer programs and community service projects designed to encourage and promote civic involvement and volunteerism in youth enrolled in secondary and post-secondary institutions for the purposes of alleviating social misfortune and the reduction of hunger in their communities; charitable services, namely, the coordination, collection, procurement, and distribution of food donations from manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, and government agencies to organizations providing free food to needy people; charitable services, namely organizing and conducting corporate sponsorship programs to promote public awareness of hunger and social misfortune issues | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |