USPTO serial 78428551
Serial No. 78428551
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78428551?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Glenn
Michael A. Glenn Glenn Patent Group3475 Edison Way, Suite LMenlo Park, CA 94025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | range hoods, electric fans, air conditioners, electric heating fans, exhaust fans, deep fat fryers, electric bread cookers, electric coffee makers, electric rice cookers, electric rice steamers, electric space heaters, electric heating plates, toasters, electric hot water pots, convection ovens, soya milk makers, refrigerators and electric hot plates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |