USPTO serial 78428733
IMA DESIGNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMA DESIGNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mt. Pleasant, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nils H. Ljungman
NILS H LJUNGMAN NILS H LJUNGMAN & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 130GREENSBURG, PA 15601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stationery; stationery writing paper and envelopes; note pads | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 018 | Change purses | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 020 | Picture frames | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | Mugs, namely, glass mugs, porcelain mugs, earthenware mugs; plastic water bottles sold empty | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | Shirts, namely, t-shirts, sweat shirts, sleep shirts, golf shirts, knit shirts, night shirts, polo shirts, and sport shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zufall, Diana
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named IMA DESIGNS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |