USPTO serial 78429482
PERMIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3248921Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2007
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERMIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
Sunrise, FL
Other trademarks owned by Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
Sunrise, FL
Other trademarks owned by Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
Sunrise, FL
Other trademarks owned by Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy J. Benjamin, Robert J. Sacco, Andrew Baum, Paul Fields, Robert S. Weisbein, Eric A. Prager, Karin Segall, Laura J. Winston, Abigail Rubinstein and Kathryn Starnella
Robert J. Sacco FOX ROTHSCHILD, LLP997 Lenox DriveBuilding 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Liquid filter bags used in production machinery for use in removing particulate from liquids, namely, paints, oils, refrigerants, water, beverages, and chemicals for commercial and industrial use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 2001 |
| 011 | Liquid filter bags for use as part of a filtering apparatus for industrial use in removing particulate from liquids, namely, paints, oils, refrigerants, water, beverages, and chemicals, for commercial and industrial use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Mechanical Manufacturing Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named PERMIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |