Drawing for SMART2GO

USPTO serial 78429688

SMART2GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART2GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin Segall and Robert S. Weisbein

Karin Segall and Robert S. Weisbein Foley & Lardner LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific and electrical devices, namely cellular phones, personal digital assistants, portable wireless voice and data transmission devices, namely, mobile phones, pagers, wireless e-mail and messaging devices, namely, electronic handheld units for the wireless receipt and/or transmission of data that enable the user to keep track of or manage personal information; personal communication devices and instruments, namely, personal digital assistants, personal digital assistants with radio modules for mobile phone networks, mobile phones with support for software applications, mobile phones with digital messaging capabilities; video devices, namely analogue and digital transmission devices, namely video cameras for transmitting still pictures and motion pictures via wireless or wired means; devices for recordings, namely, analogue and digital video-recorders, hand disk recorders, live streaming and recording devices, namely video cameras for transmission and for replay of sound, data and/or image over mobile digital data networks and fixed line networks; data processing devices, namely, intelligent portable devices namely personal digital assistants for mobile communication networks and portable computing devices, and computers; integrated circuits for computers, particularly for data transmission; computer programs for on-and offline mapping, navigation, localization, real-time and delayed communication, business information database applications in the field of mobile geographic information and communication, stored on data carriers; telephones, cellular telephones, namely mobile telephones with data exchange means for the Internet; modems; devices for broadband fixed lines, namely modems, switches, couplers, dialers, for data transmissionACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing on-line access and electronic telecommunication connections to databases containing navigation data, telecommunications gateway, routing and junction services by access ports and server hardware and other network components that allow hosting of applications that can be accessed using mobile devices through wireless networks or PC connected via fixed lines to computer communication networks for transmission of messages, information, sound, images and data services provided by on-line-information providers, content providers and location based servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, sports and cultural activities, namely organizing sports and cultural activitiesACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for accessing global positioning system dataACTIVE—
045Dating servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 30, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 26, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 15, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance