Drawing for BIG PRETTY

USPTO serial 78429689

BIG PRETTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, CHERYL L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG PRETTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the form of a live performer in television, film and musicACTIVESep 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 25, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jan 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 15, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance