USPTO serial 78429740
ECO VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Gilmore
Richard C. Gilmore MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGH111 S. Main StreetSuite 600Salt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric accumulators for bicycles, electric cables for bicycles, computers for bicycles, speed indicators for bicycles, distance measuring apparatus for bicycles in the nature of odometers, distance recording apparatus for bicycles in the nature of odometers, distance indicators for bicycles in the nature of odometers, automatic indicators for pressure in bicycle tires, helmets for bicyclists, eyeglasses, sunglasses, protective eye goggles and cases, stop signals, protective clothing for bicyclists for protection against accidents, eyeglass frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Bicycles, parts and fittings for bicycles, namely, hubs, internal gear hubs, bicycle dynamo hubs, hub quick release levers, gear release levers, gear shift levers, front derailleurs, rear derailleurs, chain guides, freewheels, sprockets, pulleys, chains, chain deflectors, shift cables, cranks, crank sets, chain wheels, pedals, toe clips, brake levers, front brakes, rear brakes, brake cables, brake shoes, rims, wheels, spokes, spoke clips, bottom brackets, seat pillars, seat pillar quick release, head parts for frame-fork assembly, suspensions, handlebars, handlebar stems, grips for handlebars, saddles, derailleurs controlled by computer, wheel bags for bicycles, direction indicators for bicycles; signals for bicycles in the nature of turn signals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |