CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for K-T ANALYZER

USPTO serial 78429779

K-T ANALYZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3249952Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2007
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with K-T ANALYZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold Milstein

Harold Milstein Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP1540 El Camino Real, Suite 120Menlo Park, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, software and user manuals sold as a unit, all for analysis of inspection, metrology and testing data of materials and surfacesACTIVEDec 5, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 17, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 17, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 2, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 4, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 5, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 14, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 14, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 27, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 26, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance