Drawing for CENTRAL VETERINARY CONFERENCE

USPTO serial 78430123

CENTRAL VETERINARY CONFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3010959Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2005
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CENTRAL VETERINARY CONFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martha Markusen

MARTHA MARKUSEN FRYBERGER, BUCHANAN, SMITH & FREDERICK302 W SUPERIOR ST STE 700DULUTH, MN 55802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Arranging and conducting trade shows relating to the veterinary professionSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 5, 1989
041Educational services, namely arranging and conducting conferences relating to the veterinary professionSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 5, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 13, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 29, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 4, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 1, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 9, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2005GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance