USPTO serial 78430146
GROUP3 COSMETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROUP3 COSMETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeremy J. Thornton
CHARLES A CREHORE ULMER & BERNE LLP1300 E 9TH ST STE 900CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | makeup, namely, facial makeup, eye makeup and foundation makeup, cosmetic pencils, rouge, skin and beauty masks, foundations, concealers, blusher, eye shadows, eye liners, eye pencils, mascara, lipsticks, non-medicated lip balm, lip pencils, lip gloss, cosmetic lip creams, non-medicated lip conditioner, non-medicated lip moisturizer, non-medicated lip gels, powders for the face and body, perfume, cologne, eau de toilette, eau de parfum, aftershave, deodorants, antiperspirants, personal deodorants, soap, deodorant soap, saddle soap, skin soaps, liquid soap, shampoo, conditioners, baby shampoo, bubble bath, bath gel, shower gel, hair gel, hair care preparations, hair relaxing preparations, nail enamel, nail enamel remover, nail strengthener, cuticle removing preparations, nail care preparations, nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter, nail hardeners, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish remover, nail polish top coat, body lotion, hand cream, bust cream, eye cream, night creams, skin cleansing creams, skin creams, vanishing creams, skin moisturizers, wrinkle removing creams, facial moisturizers, non-medicated foot powder, baby talcum powder, baby powder, body powder, face powder, bath powder, talcum powder, makeup removers, facial cleaners, eye makeup removers, astringents for cosmetic purposes, skin cleansing lotions, cold creams, facial scrubs, skin clarifiers, skin cleansing lotions, skin emollients, skin lighteners, skin lotions, skin moisturizers, skin toner, after sun gel, sun block preparations, sunscreen preparations, sun tanning preparations, baby oil, body oil, essential oils for personal use, massage oil, petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic cotton for cosmetic purposes, cotton puffs for cosmetic purposes, cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes, cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, breath fresheners, shaving balm, shaving gel, shaving lotion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |