Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78430159?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78430159. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns LARGE MARGE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78430159, the listed owner(s) include: Quality Bicycle Products, inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78430159?

Serial number 78430159 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark LARGE MARGE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover LARGE MARGE?

The public record lists International Classes: 012. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78430159

LARGE MARGE

Q: What is the current status of LARGE MARGE?

LARGE MARGE (78430159) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jun 4, 2004
Status date: Sep 5, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LARGE MARGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Quality Bicycle Products, inc.
Bloomington, MN
Other trademarks owned by Quality Bicycle Products, inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matt S. Moore

MATT S MOORE QUALITY BICYCLE PRODUCTS INC6400 W 105TH STBLOOMINGTON, MN 55438UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
012	Bicycles; bicycle parts, namely, bicycle wheels and rims for bicycle wheels sold only to extreme bicyclists through specialty bicycle retail stores	ACTIVE	Oct 10, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 20, 2006	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 20, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Nov 4, 2006	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Sep 5, 2006	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jul 6, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jul 6, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jun 30, 2006	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
Jun 30, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jun 27, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 12, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 12, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 13, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 13, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 6, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 6, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 9, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—