Drawing for BLOOMBERG LAW

USPTO serial 78430177

BLOOMBERG LAW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLOOMBERG LAW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miwako Hosaka

Miwako Hosaka Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP787 Seventh AvenueNew York, NY 10019-6099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and downloadable software for use in accessing computerized databases and other indexes of information and performing personal computing applications in the fields of research, analysis and reporting of a variety of topics, namely, news, computerized databases and other indexes of information, law, government and public records, business; computer software and downloadable software for interactive, electronic communications about news, research, computerized databases and other indexes of information, law, government and public records, businessACTIVE—
016Publications, namely, charts, newsletters, and trade and professional books in the fields of news, research, computerized databases and other indexes of information, law, government and public records, business and politicsACTIVE—
035computerized database management; arranging and conducting trade shows in the fields of news, research, computerized databases and other indexes of information, law, government and public records; providing a directory of information in the field of lawyers and legal servicesACTIVE—
038interactive electronic and audio and visual communication and information broadcasting over, by or through local or wide area computer networks, wireless communication networks, global computer information networks and other electronic communication networks; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the fields of news, research, computerized databases and other indexes of information, law, government and public records, business; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the fields of news, research, computerized databases and other indexes of information, law, government and public records, businessACTIVE—
041entertainment services in the nature of ongoing audio and visual programs in the fields of news, research, computerized databases and other indexes of information, law, government and public records, business; entertainment services in the nature of production and distribution of ongoing audio and visual programs in the fields of news, research, computerized databases and other indexes of information, law, government and public records, businessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2008ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 20, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 20, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2008UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN—
Feb 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance