USPTO serial 78430336
PIXIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIXIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N.J. Ruggiero
CHARLES NJ RUGGIERO OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLEONE LANDMARK SQ 10TH FLSTAMFORD, CT 06901-2682UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic instruments and scientific equipment, namely, cameras, digital cameras, and spectrometers | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |