Drawing for ERASER THERAPY

USPTO serial 78430354

ERASER THERAPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERASER THERAPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin M. Kerenyi, Esq.

Justin M. Kerenyi, Esq. Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, P.C.191 Peachtree StreetSuite 2900Atlanta, GA 30303

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 17, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 15, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 26, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance