USPTO serial 78430579
GENERAL VEGETABLES GV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENERAL VEGETABLES GV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oils, preserved olives, broths, onion preserves, concentrated broth, vegetable preserves, consomme, processed potato flakes, cheese croquettes, vegetable croquettes, vegetable salads, legumes salad, edible jellies, humus, ginger marmalade, julienne style vegetable soup, cooked legumes, preserved legumes, dried legumes, preserved lentil, raisin marmalade, potato chips, french fries, fruit pulp, tomato puree, soup preparations, soups, tomato juice for cooking and vegetable juices for cooking | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Potato fritters, confections, salad dressings, aromatic seasonings, sugar, caramels, chutneys, curry, spaghetti, candies, chewing gum for non medical use, ginger, ketchup, macaroni, relish, tomato sauce, hot sauce from soy, sauces, seasonings, tarts, cakes, tortillas, vinegar, honey, mustard, pastas, paprika, pizzas | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh olives, leek, pumpkin, fresh vegetables, fresh legumes, potatoes, cucumbers, peppers, rhubarb, unprocessed grains | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Seltzer water, still water, water with gas, mineral waters, isotonic beverages, syrups for beverages, non alcoholic cocktail mixes, soda pops, non-alcoholic beverages comprising sherbets, tomato juice, vegetable juice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Francesco Ducrey Giordano
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GENERAL VEGETABLES GV
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |