USPTO serial 78430622
JOHN LAUTNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3264265Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JOHN LAUTNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah S. Conley
SARAH S CONLEY ROSEN FEIG CONLEY & LUNN LLP247 S BEVERLY DR STE 100BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, lectures, seminars, and workshops in the field of architectural design history, specifically with regard to John Lautner designs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 29, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The John Lautner Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by The John Lautner Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by The John Lautner Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named JOHN LAUTNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | RGOA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |