Drawing for QUANTUM RESULTS BOOT CAMP

USPTO serial 78431010

QUANTUM RESULTS BOOT CAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUANTUM RESULTS BOOT CAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VINCENT M. AMBERLY

VINCENT M AMBERLY DUNLAP, GRUBB, WEAVER & WHITBECK PC1800 ALEXANDER BELL DR STE 400RESTON, VA 20191-5459UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services, namely, organization effectiveness, organizational development, workforce development, management and leadership development, performance consulting, profit and revenue consultation, team development, team-based organization consulting and training, managing logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain services, supply chain visibility and synchronization, supply and demand forecasting and product distribution processes for others; business management consultation and planning services, namely, providing management information on a wide variety of topics to service providing professionals, including organizational consultation, business planning, business process re-engineering services, business relocation consulting, business research, business research and surveys, and business succession planningACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 17, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance