Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78431015?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78431015. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns NO KRUMBS, A TREAT THAT SKIPS THE HIPS!?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78431015, the listed owner(s) include: Allen, Bette.

What is USPTO serial number 78431015?

Serial number 78431015 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark NO KRUMBS, A TREAT THAT SKIPS THE HIPS!. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of NO KRUMBS, A TREAT THAT SKIPS THE HIPS!?

NO KRUMBS, A TREAT THAT SKIPS THE HIPS! (78431015) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover NO KRUMBS, A TREAT THAT SKIPS THE HIPS!?

The public record lists International Classes: 045. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: NO KRUMBS, A TREAT THAT SKIPS THE HIPS! Serial# 78431015 | status 601; last event MAB1 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO KRUMBS, A TREAT THAT SKIPS THE HIPS!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Allen, Bette
Berryton, KS
Other trademarks owned by Allen, Bette

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Kreisman

JASON FLETES HILL, BEAM-WARD, KRUSE & WILSON LLC8695 COLLEGE BLVD STE 200OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
045	Customized gift preparations made of items such as sheets, blankets, diapers, tablecloths, robes, rugs, culinary, baby, wedding and/or automobile accessories	ACTIVE	Feb 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 28, 2006	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Aug 28, 2006	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Aug 28, 2006	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Mar 9, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 28, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Feb 23, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 23, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2006	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Feb 23, 2006	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Feb 6, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Dec 27, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 24, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 14, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

NO KRUMBS, A TREAT THAT SKIPS THE HIPS!