USPTO serial 78431166
NEUROBIONIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEUROBIONIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin St-Amant
MARTIN ST-AMANT CAIN LAMARRE CASGRAIN WELLS580 GRANDE ALLEE EST STE 440QUEBEC CITY, QC G1R 2K2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Biomedical devices, namely, nerve cuffs, control systems for regulating biological functions, namely, sensors, feedback amplifiers and electrical stimulators; surgical tools for implanting nerve cuffs and associated biomedical devices; biomedical equipment for use in medical procedures, namely, electrical leads, electrical power supplies, signal amplifiers, signal processing units, software for signal transmission, hardware for signal transmission, namely, radio frequency and infrared transmitters and receivers, computer software for analyzing, calibrating and processing bioelectrical signals, hardware for analyzing, calibrating and processing bioelectrical signals, namely, electronic amplifiers, rectifiers, bin integrators, impedance meters, threshold detectors and computer software for controlling the stimulation of nerves; ; 1199295 Biomedical devices, namely, nerve cuffs, control systems for regulating biological functions, namely, sensors, feedback amplifiers and electrical stimulators; surgical tools for implanting nerve cuffs and associated biomedical devices; biomedical equipment for use in medical procedures, namely, electrical leads, electrical power supplies, signal amplifiers, signal processing units, software for signal transmission, hardware for signal transmission, namely, radio frequency and infrared transmitters and receivers, computer software for analyzing, calibrating and processing bioelectrical signals, hardware for analyzing, calibrating and processing bioelectrical signals, namely, electronic amplifiers, rectifiers, bin integrators, impedance meters, threshold detectors and computer software for controlling the stimulation of nerves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |