USPTO serial 78431212
Serial No. 78431212
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78431212?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Lee Taylor
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Fine art, namely originally created sculptures, drawings, paintings, prints, lithographs, art reproductions, ironworks, fabrics | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Mirrors for hanging on walls; furniture, namely wardrobes, credenzas, tables, chairs and desks | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 027 | Furnishings, namely image panels for hanging on walls, image screens for partitioning rooms, image tiles made of plaster, image tiles made of plaster and metal composition, and image plaques | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of furnishings, namely image panels, image screens, mirrors, image tiles and image plaques; custom manufacture of furniture | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Fine art design | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sid Dickens, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |