CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ROCKY LEGENDS

USPTO serial 78431301

ROCKY LEGENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174904Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
BAKER,JORDAN A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ROCKY LEGENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gazal Pour-Moezzi

Gazal Pour-Moezzi Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP650 Town Center Drive, 10th FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnetically encoded computer game programs; [ computer software for multimedia and interactive computer games contained on cassettes, ] cartridges, [ tapes ] and CD ROMs; [ video and computer game cassettes ] and cartridges adapted for use with television receivers; [ computer hardware and ] software for multimedia and interactive computer games; computer game cartridges [, cassettes, programs and tapes ]ACTIVESep 28, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 28, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 28, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 28, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 20, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 20, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 20, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 23, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 20, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 8, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 6, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 6, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 26, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 7, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 5, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 6, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 23, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 16, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 16, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 2, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 8, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2006AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Dec 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 6, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 6, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2006SNEASU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 26, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 8, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance