USPTO serial 78431679
DIMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene J.A. Gierczak/MC
EUGENE J A GIERCZAK MILLER THOMSON LLP20 QUEEN ST W STE 2500TORONTO, ON M5H 3S1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | microelectric controls for use in automated building environmental control systems and on-site and off-site monitoring systems which measure, monitor and control heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, security requirements, pressure, humidity, electrical requirements, refrigeration, water treatment, and fabrication controls; Remote condition monitoring systems for buildings comprising of software and hardware, field sensors, transmitters and actuators for use to monitor heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, security requirements, pressure, humidity, electrical requirements, refrigeration, water treatment, and fabrication controls, in buildings; Internet connectivity devices, namely computer hardware and software for connecting computers to the worldwide web, serial communication port devices, parallel port devices; Electronic monitoring and control systems comprised of hardware and software, multi loop controllers, field sensors, transmitters, actuators, serial communication port devices, and parallel port devices for use in measuring, monitoring and controlling heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, security requirements, pressure, humidity, electrical use, refrigeration, water treatment, and fabrication controls in buildings; Computer software for controlling heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, security requirements, pressure, humidity, electrical requirements, refrigeration, water treatment, and fabrication control monitoring systems; computer software for remote monitoring of building access systems | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1991 |
| 035 | Designing, controlling, on-site and off-site monitoring, installation, and maintenance services of control systems and monitoring for buildings, namely automated building control systems, security systems, temperature and ventilation control systems, lighting control systems, energy management systems and remote monitoring systems; facility management services | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |