Drawing for YORK TECHNICAL INSTITUTE

USPTO serial 78431882

YORK TECHNICAL INSTITUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3065148Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2006
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YORK TECHNICAL INSTITUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

David M. Perry BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE8TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, seminars and courses of instruction in the fields of business, computers, electronics, automation, culinary arts and food services, mechanics, public safety, security, building and refrigeration systems, drafting and design, travel, tourism and hospitality, technology, and medical and healthSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 30, 1967

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 16, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 6, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 6, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance