Drawing for HOST OF THE COAST

USPTO serial 78431942

HOST OF THE COAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HOST OF THE COAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LeRoy T. Rahn

LEROY T RAHN CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043HOTEL SERVICES AND RESTAURANT SERVICESABANDONED—
045SOCIAL CLUB SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 18, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 18, 2010CU.TCONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 18, 2010CU.MCONCURRENT USE DISSOLVED—
Mar 14, 2008CU.ICONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2006GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 24, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance