Drawing for POLYGREEN-T

USPTO serial 78432512

POLYGREEN-T

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYGREEN-T?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith E. Danish

KEITH E DANISH KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS; SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; NAIL CARE PREPARATIONSACTIVE—
005MEDICATED HAIR, SKIN AND NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS; PREPARATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF SKIN WOUNDS, DIABETIC WOUNDS AND PSORIASISACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2007LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Sep 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 20, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 2, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance