Drawing for ROSETTA MILLINGTON

USPTO serial 78432725

ROSETTA MILLINGTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROSETTA MILLINGTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Grace

DAVID W GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4164UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, SWIM WEAR, PANTS, SHORTS, SHIRTS, TOPS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, PAJAMAS, SWEATERS, COATS, ROMPERS, INFANT GOWNS, AND HATSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 1, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 22, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 22, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance