USPTO serial 78432959
LUXOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3020126Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUXOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric automatic bread makers for domestic use; electric kettles, electric pressure cookers, electric rice cookers, gas rice cookers; slow cookers; electric toasters; electric coffee makers; electric barbecue griddles; ovens for cooking; electric cooking stoves; electric cooking stoves with ovens; gas cooking stoves; gas cooking stoves with ovens; microwave ovens; refrigerators, gas refrigerators, freezer, cold/hot water dispensers; cold water dispensers; hot water dispensers; electric fans, ventilating fans, electric air purifiers, range hoods for cookers, electric dehumidifiers, electric humidifiers, ceiling fans, air conditioners for rooms, electric hair dryers, electric clothes dryers; electric coffee makers, Electric indoor grills, Electric slow cookers, Electric deep fryers, Electric skillets | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |