USPTO serial 78433002
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500ONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video tapes featuring training in health and safety matters | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Section 44 (D) in class 16 Printed and partially printed information forms; Newsletters and pamphlets concerning health and safety matters; Resource and training documents, namely, brochures, books, posters, printed reports and printed guides, all concerning health and safety | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing information in the field of health and safety management; health and safety consulting for businesses and individuals; providing information in the field of health and safety management, preparing business reports related to the field of health and safety management; arranging and conducting trade shows and conferences in the field of business and business management providing information in the fields of consulting related to the field of health and safety management | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Section 44(D) in class 41 Developing educational materials for others in the field of health and safety consulting for business and individuals and Educational and training services, namely, conducting courses, seminars, workshops, and classes in the field of health and safety consulting for businesses and individuals and distributing course materials in connection therewith; Conducting training and workshop services in the field of health and safety consulting for businesses and individuals and issuing certificates of achievement in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Section 1 (A) in class 42 Providing internet services, namely, creating or maintaining web sites for others in the field of health and safety consulting for business and individuals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |