USPTO serial 78433111
CATHERINE FULMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CATHERINE FULMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy H. Wepner
ROY H WEPNER LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & ME600 S AVE W STE 300WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | DRESSES, INCLUDING PLEATED DRESSES, SPAGHETTI STRAP SUMMER DRESSES, HALTER TOP DRESSES, COUTURE BLACK TIE GOWNS, and GRAFFITI DRESSES; SKIRTS, INCLUDING DENIM SKIRTS, PLEATED SKIRTS, and LEATHER PENCIL SKIRTS; PANTS, INCLUDING MEN'S TROUSERS, PANTS WITH SIDE ZIPPERS, DENIM JEANS, WOMEN'S LINEN TROUSERS, and LEATHER PANTS; JACKETS, INCLUDING DENIM JACKETS, JACKETS WITH ZIPPERS, and LEATHER BOMBER JACKETS; TOPS, INCLUDING COTTON TUBE TOPS, LONG SLEEVED TOPS, T-SHIRTS, HALTER TOPS, VINTAGE TRIMMED TOPS, INCLUDING TUBE, TURTLENECK BLOUSES, and PRINT TOPS; SUITS, INCLUDING MEN'S SUITS INCLUDING SUITS CONSISTING OF BLAZERS AND PANTS, and CAT SUITS; SCARVES, INCLUDING WOOL SCARVES; UNDERGARMENTS, INCLUDING UNDERWEAR, BRAS, SLIPS and SATEEN SLIPS; BATHING SUITS; SHOES; SOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |