Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78433131?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78433131. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CANDLE PEEPERS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78433131, the listed owner(s) include: H.I.S.C., H.I.S.C..

What is USPTO serial number 78433131?

Serial number 78433131 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CANDLE PEEPERS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of CANDLE PEEPERS?

CANDLE PEEPERS (78433131) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover CANDLE PEEPERS?

The public record lists International Classes: 020. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78433131

CANDLE PEEPERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jun 10, 2004
Status date: Jul 7, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANDLE PEEPERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

H.I.S.C.
San Clemente, CA
Other trademarks owned by H.I.S.C.
H.I.S.C.
San Clemente, CA
Other trademarks owned by H.I.S.C.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard m Gitten

Howard m Gitten Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLPPO Box 130New York, NY 10150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
020	Candle accessories, namely, decorative figurines made of poly-resin and plastic to be placed on the candle	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 2, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 2, 2008	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2008	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2008	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Jan 3, 2008	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Jan 3, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2007	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Mar 22, 2007	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Mar 22, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2006	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Dec 27, 2006	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Dec 27, 2006	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2006	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Feb 24, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Feb 17, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Feb 1, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Feb 1, 2006	ZZZX	PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN	—
Feb 1, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 20, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jan 20, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 20, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jan 20, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 18, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 18, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jul 20, 2005	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 11, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 11, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 17, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—