Drawing for AGILATION

USPTO serial 78433286

AGILATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGILATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Sullivan, Jr.

MARTHA GAYLE BARBER ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S TRYON ST STE 4000BANK OF AMERICA PLZCHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing on-line insurance administrative services in the field of mortgage lending and lender placed hazard insurance, and on-line tracking of insurance coverage of mortgaged real estate; electronic property claims processing; defaulted loan property inspections and property preservation services relating to insurance coverage of mortgaged real estateACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2006PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Feb 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance