USPTO serial 78433552
JUICIFUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUICIFUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Bell
David A. Bell Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory AvenueSuite 700Dallas, TX 75219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, cosmetics and toiletries, namely, perfume, eau de parfum, eau de toilette, cologne, bath oil, body lotion, shower gel, bath gel, bubble bath, cleansing shower cream, after-shower/bath body cream, dusting powder, body cleansing lotion, body cleansing cream, facial cleansing lotion, facial cleansing cream, facial cleansing gel, foaming cleansing body lotion, foaming cleansing body cream, skin moisturizing lotion, skin moisturizing cream, skin moisturizing balm, skin moisturizing gel, facial moisturizing lotion, facial moisturizing cream, facial moisturizing gel, body balm, body cleansing scrub, moisturizing foot balm, body spray, body mist, liquid bath soak, powdered bath soak, body exfoliating cleanser, hand cream, foot cream, massage oil, self-tanning bronzing lotion, self-tanning bronzing cream, exfoliating facial masque, cleansing facial masque, moisturizing facial masque, liquid body wash, cleansing bar, fragranced soap, bath salts, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair gel, hair mousse, hair color, and hairspray | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |