Drawing for WORLD CLASS WEDDINGS

USPTO serial 78433554

WORLD CLASS WEDDINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLD CLASS WEDDINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Alison Grabell

THOMAS M SMALL BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Special event planning; special event planning consultationACTIVE—
043Arranging travel tours; travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation, temporary lodging, restaurants and meals, and excursions; travel booking agenciesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 20, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 10, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2006MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Mar 17, 2006ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Mar 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance