USPTO serial 78433680
EZICOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZICOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Greenford, Middlesex UB6 ONN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon R. Pontaoe
SHELDON R PONTAOE GLAXOSMITHKLINEFIVE MOORE DRMAI-B443RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of infectious diseases, pain, inflammation, sepsis, alopecia and obesity, and for the treatment of viral, metabolic, musculoskeletal, cardiopulmonary, genitourinary, oncological, respiratory, neurological, gastrointestinal, hormonal, dermatological and psychiatric related diseases and disorders and skin and tissue repair preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |