Drawing for NICKELODEON UNFABULOUS

USPTO serial 78433703

NICKELODEON UNFABULOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NICKELODEON UNFABULOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lavatus Powell

LAVATUS POWELL C/O ANTHONY ORTIZ 1515 BROADWAY 51ST FLVIACOM INTERNATIONAL INCNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games and playthings, namely, card games, playing cards, darts, dolls; action figures and accessories thereof; stand alone video game machines utilizing cd rom's, stand alone video game machines, stand alone audio output game machines, and board games; sporting articles, namely, golf clubs, baseballs, footballs, paddle balls, baseball bats; decorations for Christmas treesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 6, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 22, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 12, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 27, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance