USPTO serial 78433757
CARE WITH CERTAINTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARE WITH CERTAINTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Intelligent Medical Devices, LLC
Cambridge, MA
Intelligent Medical Devices, LLC
Cambridge, MA
Intelligent Medical Devices, Inc.
Cambridge, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Ewing
James F. Ewing Foley & Lardner LLP111 Huntington Avenue, 26th FloorBoston, MA 02199UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medical diagnostic reagents; clinical medical reagents; diagnostic reagents for clinical or medical laboratory use; medical diagnostic reagents and written protocols sold therewith to perform symptom based disease diagnosis, disease diagnosis or therapeutic optimization for near patient and clinical laboratory use | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Electromagnetic medical diagnostic imaging and spectroscopic apparatus comprised of monitors and analytical processors for blood analysis and for measuring components of the complete blood count and molecular components of blood plasma | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical testing; medical testing services, namely, performing symptom based disease diagnosis, disease diagnosis or therapeutic optimization for near patient and clinical laboratory use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Medical Devices, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Medical Devices, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Medical Devices, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CARE WITH CERTAINTY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |