USPTO serial 78433773
CULT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CULT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Becker
ROBERT W. BECKER ROBERT W. BECKER & ASSOCIATES707 STATE HWY 333, STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059-7507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, excluding beer, namely, alcoholic aperitif bitters, alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors, alcoholic beverages of fruit, alcoholic bitters, alcoholic cocktails containing milk, alcoholic coffee-based beverages, alcoholic egg nog, alcoholic essences, alcoholic extracts, alcoholic fruit extracts, alcoholic malt coolers, alcoholic punch, alcoholic tea-based beverage, amontillado, anisette, aperitif wines, aperitifs, aperitifs with a distilled alcoholic liquor base, aperitifs with a wine base, arrack, blackcurrant liqueur, brandy, brandy spirits, calvados, champagne, Chinese brewed liquor, Chinese mixed liquor, Chinese spirit of sorghum, Chinese white liquor, coffee-based liqueurs, cognac, cordials, curacao, distilled spirits, flavored brewed malt beverage, fruit wine, gin, grappa, hard cider, herb liquers, hydromel, Japanese regenerated liquors, Japanese shochuh-based mixed liquor, Japanese sweet rice-based mixed liquor, Japanese white liquor, Kirsch, Liqueurs, Mezcal, natural sparkling wines, ouzo, potable spirits, prepared alcoholic cocktail, prepared wine cocktails, red wine, rum, sake, sangria, schnapps, sherry, tequila, tonic liquor containing herb extracts, tonic liquor flavored with Japanese plum extracts, Tonic liquor flavored with pine needle extracts, tonic sweet grape wine containing extracts from ginseng and cinchona bark, vermouth, vodka, whiskey, wine, wine coolers, and wine punch | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 8, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |