Drawing for PRIZE CAVE

USPTO serial 78433924

PRIZE CAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIZE CAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Walker

ELIZABELT WALKER KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM75 STATE STATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer game software; computer software for use in gaming machines; electronic gaming machines; computer software for online payment and transaction processing; video game machines for use with televisionsACTIVE—
028cards, namely bingo cards, lottery cards and keno cards and tickets, namely lottery tickets, for playing games of chance; computer game machines, namely stand alone video game machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 1, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 9, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance