USPTO serial 78434103
COSMIC-QUANTUM RAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COSMIC-QUANTUM RAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; interactive video game program and multimedia computer game program | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TOYS AND GAMES, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; MECHANICAL ACTION TOYS; ELECTRICAL ACTION TOYS; CASES FOR ACTION FIGURES; CASES FOR PLAY ACCESSORIES; CASES FOR TOY VEHICLES; WIND-UP WALKING TOYS; TOY VEHICLES; PLAYSETS FOR ACTION FIGURES; MINIATURE PLAYSETS FOR ACTION FIGURES; ROBOTIC PLAY FIGURES; INFLATABLE TOYS SHOWING DECORATIVE PICTURES; TOY GUNS; PLUSH TOYS; ANIMATED PLUSH TOYS; MECHANICAL PLUSH TOYS; BALLOONS; BATHTUB TOYS; TOY BUILDING BLOCKS; DOLLS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; DOLL CLOTHING; PLAY COSMETICS FOR CHILDREN; COSTUME MASKS; MINIATURE DIE CAST TOY VEHICLES; TOY SPACESHIPS; BATTERY OPERATED REMOTE CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES; FLYING DISCS; INFLATABLE TOY VINYL FIGURES; JIGSAW PUZZLES; KITES; TOY INDOOR SLUMBER AND PLAY TENTS; HAND-HELD PUPPETS; SIT-IN AND RIDE-ON TOY VEHICLES; TARGET SETS COMPRISED OF TARGETS AND PROJECTILES; CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS; PINBALL AND ARCADE GAME MACHINES; HAND-HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; PINBALL MACHINES; SQUEEZABLE BALLS USED TO RELIEVE STRESS; MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES AND CONSTRUCTION TOYS; CRIB MOBILES; MOBILES FOR CHILDREN; PLAYING CARDS; GAMES, NAMELY BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES AND ACTION SKILL GAMES; COMPUTER GAMES, NAMELY, BATTERY-POWERED COMPUTER GAME TOY WITH AN LCD SCREEN WHICH FEATURES ANIMATION AND SOUND; CONSOLE GAMES, NAMELY, STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER GAME; PRODUCTION OF ENTERTAINMENT SERIES IN THE NATURE OF AN ONGOING ANIMATED CARTOON PROGRAM FOR TELEVISION, CABLE, TELEVISION BROADCAST AND TELEVISION PROGRAM SYNDICATION; PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMATED PICTURE FILMS; PRODUCTION OF VIDEOTAPES, VIDEO DISCS, AND DVDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIKE YOUNG PRODUCTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cosmotoons, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cosmotoons, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COSMIC-QUANTUM RAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |