Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78434105?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78434105. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns WHOLE FRUIT?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78434105, the listed owner(s) include: Integrated Brands, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78434105?

Serial number 78434105 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark WHOLE FRUIT. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover WHOLE FRUIT?

The public record lists International Classes: 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78434105

WHOLE FRUIT

Q: What is the current status of WHOLE FRUIT?

WHOLE FRUIT (78434105) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jun 11, 2004
Status date: Jan 30, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: THOMAS, AMY E
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHOLE FRUIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Integrated Brands, Inc.
Ronkonkoma, NY
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Brands, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph F. Nicholson

JOSEPH F NICHOLSON KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	Frozen confections and novelties, namely, sorbet, ice cream, fruit ices; yogurt based beverages, dairy beverages; smoothies	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 13, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 30, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 30, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Dec 7, 2006	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
May 3, 2006	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Feb 24, 2006	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Feb 24, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Feb 17, 2006	ATRQ	ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED	—
Feb 8, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Feb 8, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Feb 8, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Aug 9, 2005	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 19, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 19, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2005	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
Mar 31, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 31, 2005	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Mar 23, 2005	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 23, 2005	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Mar 23, 2005	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Jan 19, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 17, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—