Drawing for THE PERFECT CURE " DONT JUST DRY IT.....CURE IT "

USPTO serial 78434163

THE PERFECT CURE " DONT JUST DRY IT.....CURE IT "

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PERFECT CURE " DONT JUST DRY IT.....CURE IT "?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DARREN M. GELIEBTER

Darren M. Geliebter The Dorf Law Firm, LLP740 West Boston Post RoadSuite 304Mamaroneck, NY 10543

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Ionic dryer and air circulator system comprised of air circulators, fans, screens, ionizers, dehumidifiers, air conditioners, thermometers and hygrometers, for use in connection with treating plant matter, herbs, fruits, vegetables, spices and flowersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2005GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance