USPTO serial 78434254
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Houston, TX
IRVING, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ken Dallara
Ken Dallara Law Office of Ken Dallara4052 Eagle Flight DriveSimi Valley, CA 93065UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automated or Manual residential repellent spray dispensing system comprising of self-contained chemical storage and mixing tanks, chemical proportioning valves, pumps that are activated using manual switches or automated timing devices, and a delivery means comprising tubing and fogging and misting devices, said chemical comprises of natural or synethic fluids applied into the atmosphere or topically onto foliage or nesting areas where vexatious vermin exist | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 037 | Installation and Maintenance of insecticide spraying systems that facilitate the need to eliminate through death or repealization, flying incest and authopods, through use of natural or synethic fluids applied into the atmosphere or topically onto foliage or nesting areas where vexatious vermin exist, application thereof using pre-determined automated or manually controlled timing intervals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |