Drawing for RHS

USPTO serial 78434881

RHS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tammy L. Browning-Smith

Tammy L. Browning-Smith Browning-Smith, P.C.1126 Meadowbrook Dr.Amherst, OH 44001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, namely ornamental pins, bracelets, and charmsACTIVEApr 26, 2002
020(Based on Intent to Use) non-metal goods, namely picture frames, cold cast resin figurines, non-leather key chains, and hand fansACTIVE—
022non-metal goods, namely lanyards in the nature of eyeglasses tethersACTIVEApr 1, 2004
035association services, namely promoting the interests of women; retail store and online retail store services featuring merchandise relating to women's interestsACTIVEFeb 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 1, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 20, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance