USPTO serial 78435004
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Isaacson
THOMAS M ISAACSON LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS M ISAACSON850 LINDY LNHUNTINGTOWN, MD 20639UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DISTRIBUTION JOB MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR A GROUP OF COMPUTER CLUSTERS KNOWN AS A GRID OR GRIDS, DATA-CENTERS, UTILITY-BASED COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND HETEROGENEOUS NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS, IN THE NATURE OF DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH PROVIDES A SINGLE, SECURE INTERFACE TO ALL OF THE CLUSTER, GRID OR GRIDS' COMPUTING RESOURCES FOR WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT BY ADMINISTRATORS, MANAGERS AND END-USERS IN THE NATURE OF ALLOCATION OF COMPUTER RESOURCES, ANALYSIS OF COMPUTING RESOURCE AVAILABILITY AND STATUS INFORMATION, INSTALLATION OF SOFTWARE AND SOFTWARE UPGRADES MANAGEMENT, ACCOUNTING AND USAGE MANAGEMENT FOR REPORTING AND BILLING, 3RD PARTY APPLICATION INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT, WORKLOAD POLICY MANAGEMENT, AND JOB SCHEDULING FOR BOTH BATCH AND INTERACTIVE JOBS; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING, MANAGING, PROFILING AND INDICATING AVAILABLE COMPUTING RESOURCES, NAMELY, FOR INTELLIGENT MULTIPLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, SCHEDULING AND COMPUTING RESOURCE POLICY IMPLEMENTATION THAT ENABLES ADMINISTRATORS, MANAGERS AND END-USERS TO CONTROL AND UTILIZE MULTIPLE COMPUTING RESOURCES ACROSS HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTER CLUSTERS AND FOR PROVIDING DATA IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER RESOURCES ON A GRID OR GRIDS; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR STATISTICAL DIAGNOSTIC AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING, NAMELY, UTILIZATION OF COMPUTING RESOURCES, ANALYSIS OF EFFICIENT USE OF COMPUTER RESOURCES, ANALYSIS OF OPTIMIZATION OF COMPUTING RESOURCES, ANALYSIS OF FAIR SHARING OF COMPUTING RESOURCES, ANALYSIS OF LOAD-BALANCING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS, ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS, ENTITIES, INDIVIDUALS, CLASSIFICATIONS OF QUALITY OF SERVICE, QUEUES AND COMPUTING NODES; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING A QUALITY OF SERVICE FOR SUBMITTED JOBS, SCHEDULING GUARANTEES AND JOB RESERVATIONS FOR USERS, GROUPS, CLASSES, ACCOUNTS AND LEVELS OF QUALITY OF SERVICE; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMMAND-LINE AND GRAPHICAL RESOURCE AND WORKLOAD SIMULATION, INCLUDING SIMULATION OF SIMULTANEOUS INSTANCES TO EXPLORE THE EFFECTS OF CONFIGURATIONS AND POLICIES ON A GRID OR GRIDS; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DYNAMIC COMMAND-LINE AND GRAPHICAL MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER RESOURCES, NAMELY MANAGEMENT OF SOFTWARE LICENSES WITHIN A SINGLE COMPUTER ADMINISTRATIVE DOMAIN OR ACROSS MULTIPLE HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTER ADMINISTRATIVE DOMAINS, FILE SPACE, NETWORK-ATTACHED STORAGE MEDIA, TAPE DRIVES, PROCESSORS, MEMORY, DISK, NETWORK BANDWIDTH, AND OTHER HARDWARE RESOURCES; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTERFACE AND COLLECTION OF END USER COMMANDS FOR JOB, QUEUE AND SYSTEM MANAGEMENT, INTERNAL DIAGNOSTIC AND LOGGING FACILITIES, INTEGRATION OF PROVISIONING MANAGERS, BILLING SYSTEMS, IDENTITY AND SECURITY MANAGERS AND DATABASES, AND TRANSLATION OF RESOURCE MANAGER JOB SUBMISSIONS, in International Class 009 | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |