USPTO serial 78435013
CLUSTER RESOURCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3113230Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2006
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLUSTER RESOURCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Isaacson
THOMAS M ISAACSON LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS M ISAACSON850 LINDY LNHUNTINGTOWN, MD 20639UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE WITH SECURE CONNECTIONS FOR MANAGING, SCHEDULING, SIMULATING, PERFORMANCE MONITORING, AND ACCOUNTING FOR SINGLE AND MULTIPLE DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTS, NAMELY, GROUPS OF NETWORKED COMPUTERS KNOWN AS CLUSTERS, GROUPS OF CLUSTERS KNOWN AS A GRID OR GRIDS, DATA-CENTERS AND UTILITY-BASED COMPUTING SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2001 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES AND COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, INSTALLATION AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING, SCHEDULING, SIMULATION, PERFORMANCE MONITORING, AND ACCOUNTING FOR SINGLE AND MULTIPLE DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTS NAMELY, GROUPS OF NETWORKED COMPUTERS KNOWN AS CLUSTERS AND GROUPS OF CLUSTERS KNOWN AS A GRID OR GRIDS, DATA-CENTERS AND UTILITY-BASED COMPUTING SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES AND COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF PROBLEMS REGARDING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING, SCHEDULING, SIMULATION, PERFORMANCE MONITORING, AND ACCOUNTING FOR SINGLE AND MULTIPLE DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTS NAMELY, CLUSTERS, GRIDS, DATA-CENTERS AND UTILITY-BASED COMPUTING SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES AND COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER CONSULTATION REGARDING THE DESIGN, EMULATION, CONFIGURATION, MAINTENANCE AND OPTIMIZATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING, SCHEDULING, SIMULATION, PERFORMANCE MONITORING, AND ACCOUNTING FOR SINGLE AND MULTIPLE DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTS NAMELY, CLUSTERS, GRIDS, DATA-CENTERS AND UTILITY-BASED COMPUTING SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cluster Resources, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cluster Resources, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ADAPTIVE COMPUTING ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLUSTER RESOURCES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |