Drawing for THE DA VINCI CON

USPTO serial 78435028

THE DA VINCI CON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DA VINCI CON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas D. Foster

Thomas D. Foster TDFoster - Intellectual Property Law12626 High Bluff Drive, Suite 150San Diego, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded CDs and DVDs featuring critical commentary in the field of religious issuesACTIVE—
016Series of publications, namely, books featuring critical commentary in the field of religious issues; pamphlets containing critical commentary in the field of religious issuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 28, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 24, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 18, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 18, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 11, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance