Drawing for ANDREW WEIL MD

USPTO serial 78435101

ANDREW WEIL MD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANDREW WEIL MD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce J. Goldner, Esq.

BRUCE J GOLDNER ESQ SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; personal deodorants; personal care and skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin care preparations, cosmetic creams for skin care, sun screen cream, moisturizing lotions for skin and face, non-medicated skin repair ointments for the treatment of dry skin; non-medicated skin creams and non-medicated ointments for prevention and treatment of sunburn and itches; soap; shampoos and conditioners, hair spray; toothpaste, mouthwash; sun block and sun tan lotionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 2, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 28, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 19, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 19, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance